Hello Jason, Is this the DBCP issue in question?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-44 thanks, Brad On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 13:35 -0400, Jason Shao jayshao-at-rutgers.edu | JASIG-List-2| wrote: > On Oct 8, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Cris J Holdorph wrote: > > > I'd have stronger opinions if I was using an environment other then > > Tomcat. However, in the Tomcat environment I don't see that it > > matters much either way. In higher end app-server environments, > > it's probably appropriate to let that server control the pools. > > > > Even so, you can configure spring to use JNDI datasources on a per > > installation environment if you need to. So I see no harm in > > converting if you feel strongly. > > > > Another thing to look at for a few minutes though, might be the > > recent flurry in the Sakai community trying to convert from Commons > > Connection Pooling to C3PO, which they did in response to a bug > > they hit in commons pooling. > > There's still some work to be done on the Sakai side -- UMich thinks > disabling inactive session in DBCP will avoid the deadlocking bug, > and Rutgers is actually going back to dbcp since there were other > sideaffects related to different default values for autocommit and > transactionIsolationLevel (likely Sakai specific though) > > Proxool seems to get some votes too -- though Juergen was complaining > on TSS that there aren't any really good, clear OS choices for pools. > > Jason > > -- > > Jason Shao > Application Developer > Rutgers University, Office of Instructional & Research Technology > v. 732-445-8726 | f. 732-445-5539 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http:// > jay.shao.org > > > -- You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
