On 10/8/07, Jason Shao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 8, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Cris J Holdorph wrote: > > > I'd have stronger opinions if I was using an environment other then > > Tomcat. However, in the Tomcat environment I don't see that it > > matters much either way. In higher end app-server environments, > > it's probably appropriate to let that server control the pools. > > > > Even so, you can configure spring to use JNDI datasources on a per > > installation environment if you need to. So I see no harm in > > converting if you feel strongly. > > > > Another thing to look at for a few minutes though, might be the > > recent flurry in the Sakai community trying to convert from Commons > > Connection Pooling to C3PO, which they did in response to a bug > > they hit in commons pooling. > > There's still some work to be done on the Sakai side -- UMich thinks > disabling inactive session in DBCP will avoid the deadlocking bug, > and Rutgers is actually going back to dbcp since there were other > sideaffects related to different default values for autocommit and > transactionIsolationLevel (likely Sakai specific though)
It is probably worth noting that Jason's comments regarding Rutgers are specific to the Sakai implementation, and are not related to uPortal/myRutgers or other general Java work done in Enterprise Systems & Services at Rutgers. Bill -- You are currently subscribed to uportal-dev@lists.ja-sig.org as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
