On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 15:28:40 Márton Miklós wrote: > --- urjtag/src/flash/flash.h (revision 1979) > +++ urjtag/src/flash/flash.h (working copy) > > + int amd_bypass_supported;
let's call this "bypass_supported" and drop the "amd_" part
> + cfi_array->amd_bypass_supported = 0;
do you need to set this ? doesnt it always start out at 0 via the bus driver
itself declaring it as 0 ?
> + return amd_flash_program_bypass(cfi_array, adr, buffer, count);
need a space before the "("
> The mpc837x.patch improves the programming speed via the mpc837x bus
> using the bypass flashing method.
but does that always work ? or does it only work when you're programming
flashes that are bypass_supported==1 ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2
_______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
