David Bovill wrote:
But then on the other hand I can't find two more volunteers to do some
pretty lightweight scripting on the MC IDE, so maybe not. ;)
I'd love to - though as I'm exploring the dual license possibilities I'm not
sure how to mix it in with GPL code - any ideas?
How to best to manage dual licenses for your own products is something I
won't be able to contribute much to. I haven't read the LGPL/GPL in
years, so I don't know the nuances well enough to have an opinion about
how such contributions may be used in code bases governed by that license.
But as far as the MetaCard IDE goes, its licensing is dirt simple:
We chose the X11 license since it's about as liberal as you can get
without going public domain, and allows usage of any part in any other
work, even commercial products.
While there are a great many areas which could benefit from some
enhancement in MC, at the moment I have two specific areas we could use
a hand with, and the other team members are booked with their own parts
so fresh blood looks like the answer.
If you -- or any of the other open source advocates here -- would be
interested in exploring new ground in an open source IDE which runs
under the Rev engine, here's the URL to MetaCard's home where you can
find links to the latest build and to the discussion list we use for
coordinating our work:
<http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MC_IDE/>
--
Richard Gaskin
Managing Editor, revJournal
_______________________________________________________
Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
