Judy,
One of the statements you made struck a chord in me that I'd like to get
clarification on. You mentioned (emphasis added):
> I do not argue your
> perceived value of HC, MC, SC or anything else -- I am merely stating that
> given that people can buy HC for ~$100 and SC for ~$130 (?), that those
> users are not going to 'see' the 'value' of Rev, ***which is marketed to
> them as a replacement tool with added value***, as being well-priced at 3
or
> 10 times the cost of what they're using now.
and
> (1) Both Rev & MC have tried to woo the HC community.
I have been out of the HC community for many years, and so I'm obviously
unaware of the kind of marketing that RunRev is doing to the HC community.
Can you tell me where RunRev has marketed directly to the HC community to
woo them into using Rev as a replacement?
The reason I ask is that (to me) this is a critical element; if Rev is being
marketed directly to HC users, then there is definitely some pricing issues
going on here. On the other hand, if HC users have become aware of Rev
through other means (word of mouth, etc.) and are *themselves* looking for a
replacement for HC, then it is a different story.
Can you please provide some clarification on your experience of RunRev's
marketing efforts to the HC community?
Thanks,
Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
