OK, it's a not bad thing, and that shows git growing with the times, my knowledge about this point growing 2:)
There still have another aspect: source argument of git-mv command must existed. In java env, refactoring is more common, and IDE maybe not git aware, if so the IDE refactoring will kill the operation. So the follow option maybe not really option. if hg, user can let IDE do rename/move refactor, and do repository operation by self. Please care, at the point, the source not existed. 致敬 向雅 2011/1/28 Nat Pryce <nat.pr...@gmail.com>: > On 27 January 2011 18:07, 向雅 <fya...@gmail.com> wrote: >> One point: >> If gitted, Rename/Copy Tracking, will be a BIG problem. IMV, history >> is more important than else. > > Why? I've not had a problem. In my experience, Git has detected > renames even for Java source when the content changes as part of the > rename. > > --Nat > > > -- > http://www.natpryce.com > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
