Awesome to hear, Chris, thanks. Just to clarify/confirm then: in the future, we will be able to have *both* an exact auto-index and a fulltext auto-index side-by-side?
Cheers, Aseem On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Chris Gioran < chris.gio...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > Hi Aseem, > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Aseem Kishore <aseem.kish...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Is the 1.4 auto-index only "exact"? Or can it be configured to be a > > "fulltext" index? > > Yes, currently the auto-indexes are only exact, there is no > straightforward way to configure them explicitly. This is a known > shortcoming and will be remedied pretty soon. > Another addition that is coming, by the way, is the visibility of > changes of the auto index within the transaction, instead of waiting > for commit time as is now. > > > (Btw, it would be awesome if we could have two auto-indexes: one exact, > one > > full-text. It would be great in general if all indexing could be auto. > Not > > sure when you would ever want/need manual indexing.) > > Well, a lot of use cases call for manual indexing, when for example it > is conditional or the use of multiple indexes is required. If, > however, auto indexing covers all your needs then by all means, do > just that. > > cheers, > CG > > > Aseem > > _______________________________________________ > > Neo4j mailing list > > User@lists.neo4j.org > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
