I leave it up to you to further enhance it? Regards, Hans
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 10:02 +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi Hans, > > Almost perfect: the product names are not used, and why not a specific icon > for them? > Also I wonder if we should not widen the left panel? I guess this width has > been set when the most used screen resolution was > 800x600 it's now 1024x768 > > Thanks for your time! > > Jacques > > From: "Hans Bakker" <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com> > > category/catalog tree updated in r1063625 > > > > thanks for your comments! > > > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 11:06 +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> Jacopo, > >> > >> Well spotted! I have fixed your concern at r1059279. I wonder how I missed > >> that since I was inspired by > >> AgreementServices.getCommissionForProduct() :/ > >> > >> Hans: also could you please look at the catalogs/categories tree: there is > >> only Ids in it, at least we should rather have the > >> names > >> (with the Ids would be better). Also, if we could have different icons > >> for catalogs and categories... > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Jacques > >> > >> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> > >> >I think that we should not forget about this because the fix proposed by > >> >Jacques (thanks for this) should be considered a > >> >temporary > >> >one... for example it doesn't take into account validity dates of the > >> >relationship; as a side note, the same issue (validity > >> >dates > >> >ignored) was also in the original cod committed by Hans (see the > >> >isAlternativePacking method). > >> > > >> > Kind regards, > >> > > >> > Jacopo > >> > > >> > On Jan 10, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi Hans, > >> >> > >> >> This has introduced a bug I fixed at r1057153 > >> >> > >> >> The isVirtual Product attribute shows around 160 times in > >> >> *form*.xml,*een*, *.gro*,*.ftl,*.java files. Of course I did not > >> >> check > >> >> them all. But I'd be surprised if your change has not introduced some > >> >> other side effects... > >> >> > >> >> Could youy please have a look? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks > >> >> > >> >> Jacques > >> >> > >> >> From: "Hans Bakker" <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com> > >> >>> This change is now implemented in r1040908 > >> >>> > >> >>> Related to the comment from Scott, Instead of using the existing > >> >>> association, we have created a new product association 'Alternative > >> >>> Packaging' to not interfere with the usage of Scott. > >> >>> > >> >>> An explanation can be found at: > >> >>> https://www.antwebsystems.com/content/control/ViewBlogArticle?articleContentId=16750&blogContentId=AWS_BLOG > >> >>> > >> >>> Regards, > >> >>> Hans > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 16:06 +0700, Hans Bakker wrote: > >> >>>> i could also add a new association type "alternative Uom" and then > >> >>>> still > >> >>>> use isVirtual=Y/isVariant=Y...which would not block your usage.... > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 21:34 +1300, Scott Gray wrote: > >> >>>> > Hi Hans, > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > I'm still in favor of the approach that I suggested earlier and you > >> >>>> > haven't really mentioned why it wouldn't work for you. > >> >>>> > If > you like and if you are willing to wait a couple of days I > >> >>>> > could show you what I mean with some example entity xml > >> >>>> > data. > >> >>>> > You > could then load it into a demo instance and play around with > >> >>>> > it. > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > I haven't read your proposal in detail yet but I'm not really in > >> >>>> > favor of using the isVirtual=Y/isVariant=Y combination to > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> > indicate uom specific behavior. I think it is quite possible for a > >> >>>> > product to have that combination in real life and > >> >>>> > using > >> >>>> > it > for something else would remove that possibility. Imagine a > >> >>>> > variant that is itself also a virtual with its own child > >> >>>> > variants. > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > Regards > >> >>>> > Scott > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > HotWax Media > >> >>>> > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > On 11/11/2010, at 8:46 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > A longer explanation how we want to implement this can be found > >> >>>> > > at: > >> >>>> > > http://www.antwebsystems.com/control/ViewBlogArticle?contentId=16750&blogContentId=AWS_BLOG > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > Regards, > >> >>>> > > Hans > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:52 +0700, Hans Bakker wrote: > >> >>>> > >> We are are still getting the best solution, help appreciated. > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> We are thinking of the following: > >> >>>> > >> you have a product which you sell in pieces and boxes of ten. > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> Then the product per piece is the lowest denominator and has a > >> >>>> > >> variant > >> >>>> > >> association to a virtual/variant product which is an alternative > >> >>>> > >> packaging of the product per piece and can have an adjusted > >> >>>> > >> price but no > >> >>>> > >> inventory. > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> Currently the e-commerce checks for the virtual flag and want to > >> >>>> > >> show a > >> >>>> > >> feature selection list, however in the case of the virtual- and > >> >>>> > >> variant > >> >>>> > >> flag both set, it should not. > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> When the box of 10 is selected, The productId per piece is > >> >>>> > >> selected with > >> >>>> > >> the adjusted price of the box variant. > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> Comments very much appreciated. > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> Regards, > >> >>>> > >> Hans > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > >> On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 12:13 -0600, David E Jones wrote: > >> >>>> > >>> For boxes of a product you'll usually have one product that > >> >>>> > >>> represents the individual items (which may or may not be > >> >>>> > >>> for > >> >>>> > >>> > >>> sale directly to the customer), and one that is a > >> >>>> > >>> product that represents the box and that is associated with > >> >>>> > >>> the > > >> >>>> > >>> >>> individual item. In OFBiz there are a few different > >> >>>> > >>> product types you can choose from to have the system handle > >> >>>> > >>> the > >> >>>> > >>> box in > >>> different ways automatically, or you can use plain > >> >>>> > >>> old Finished Good to handle the boxes manually. > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> For certain products all you need is the three fields already > >> >>>> > >>> on the Product entity: > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> quantityUomId > >> >>>> > >>> quantityIncluded > >> >>>> > >>> piecesIncluded > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> For example if you have a six-pack of 12oz soda cans you would > >> >>>> > >>> have quantityIncluded=12, quantityUomId=oz, > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> piecesIncluded=6. > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> -David > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>> On Oct 2, 2010, at 11:02 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >>>> Hi Scott, this is sure an interesting idea, but then how does > >> >>>> > >>>> the system > >> >>>> > >>>> know that they are for example 10 pieces in a box? I still > >> >>>> > >>>> what to have > >> >>>> > >>>> the same inventory for boxes and pieces. > >> >>>> > >>>> We should be able to store the conversion between the uom's > >> >>>> > >>>> for this > >> >>>> > >>>> product somewhere? > >> >>>> > >>>> > >> >>>> > >>>> Thanks for you input! > >> >>>> > >>>> > >> >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >> >>>> > >>>> Hans > >> >>>> > >>>> > >> >>>> > >>>> On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 17:39 +1300, Scott Gray wrote: > >> >>>> > >>>>> Hi Hans, > >> >>>> > >>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>> Sorry if this is a silly question, but why not just use > >> >>>> > >>>>> different products for different UOMs? You could use > > >> >>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>> virtual/variants if you wanted the UOM to be selectable on a > >> >>>> > >>>>> single product page and also marketing packages to > > >> >>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>> automatically produce inventory for the desired UOM from the > >> >>>> > >>>>> base UOM. > >> >>>> > >>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>> Regards > >> >>>> > >>>>> Scott > >> >>>> > >>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>> HotWax Media > >> >>>> > >>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >> >>>> > >>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>> On 3/10/2010, at 3:54 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >> >>>> > >>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>> Thank you BJ, > >> >>>> > >>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>> I had in mind to create and 'productUomAlternatives' table > >> >>>> > >>>>>> to the > >> >>>> > >>>>>> product with a conversion for example from pieces to boxes > >> >>>> > >>>>>> with an > >> >>>> > >>>>>> optional price adjustment percentage. > >> >>>> > >>>>>> The system will have however only one uom where everything > >> >>>> > >>>>>> gets > >> >>>> > >>>>>> converted to. > >> >>>> > >>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>> Anybody else other solutions? > >> >>>> > >>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >> >>>> > >>>>>> Hans. > >> >>>> > >>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 10:21 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote: > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> Yes also like a Feed store will have boxes, Sacks, and > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> loose feed. > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> I used the multiple pricing model for the Uom Measure > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> in the product screen made it allow multiple UOM. > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> added to the code that converts from what is received in > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> inventory to > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> what is sold so it walks through the Uom. for instance a > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> feed store > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> Receives feed in Bulk and then sacks it as inventory is > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> required. > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> The Inventory levels have to be checked to see how many in > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> a product > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> run to generate to sack up the grain. This Triggers an Seca. > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> I think a nice touch would be that the could generates the > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> product data > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> to show up in orders, based on the Uoms that were generated > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> for the > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> products. it would follow the same model for inventory > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> levels on the > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> orderentry and Ecommerce > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> Hans Bakker sent the following on 10/2/2010 4:29 AM: > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> A question to the community: > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> sometimes the same products are sold with different units > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> of measure. > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> Example gold jewelry. > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> Per piece, per box of 10, per box of 50 and per gram gold > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> weight. > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> Is here a preference how to implement that? > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> Remember this has to show up in e-commerce, orders, > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> shipments and > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> invoices... > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> Regards, > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> Hans > >> >>>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > >> >>>> > >>>>>> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > >> >>>> > >>>>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > >> >>>> > >>>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>>> > >> >>>> > >>>> > >> >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > >> >>>> > >>>> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > >> >>>> > >>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > >> >>>> > >>>> > >> >>>> > >>> > >> >>>> > >> > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > -- > > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > >> >>>> > > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > >> >>>> > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > >> >>> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > >> >>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > > > > -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
