I would like to mention that the author of Script BASIC (Peter Verhas)
turned over the project to me in 2005 so he could be a Java genius.
(which he is as well as anything else he does)



On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 04:10 -0700, John Spikowski wrote:
> Why I don't like Java. (see previous disclaimer)
> 
> 1. Linux shared objects are foreign entities.
> 2. Communication with the JAR requires two tin cans.
> 3. A product of the LarryWare that comes with a tort instead of a
> warranty.
> 
> I use Java via B4J when I have to.
> 
>  
> 
> On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 13:52 +0300, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
> > Hi John,
> > 
> > Many methods exist. Your app could have its own logs (like ofbiz). Java
> > -XDebug, specialized tools like JMeter for load testing. The resources on
> > this are numerous. Then again, debugging any environment after a crash is a
> > challenge. You can apply the same question to LAMP, RoR, Linux, Windows or
> > whatever. It's all about being familiar with the environment and the tools
> > and methods really.
> > 
> > Taher Alkhateeb
> > 
> > On Saturday, 9 April 2016, John Spikowski <e-m...@johnspikowski.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Disclaimer: Not trying to sound negative.
> > >
> > > How do you debug this monster after a crash?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 12:49 +0300, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
> > > > John,
> > > >
> > > > You're confusing VM with JVM. And if you think Java is unstable perhaps
> > > > read into it some more. Java is the most powerful eco
> > > > -system for business on the planet!
> > > >
> > > > Taher Alkhateeb
> > > > On Apr 9, 2016 12:46 PM, "John Spikowski" <e-m...@johnspikowski.com
> > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > My biggest concern using Java is its fragile VM environment. What do
> > > you
> > > > > tell a client when the Java balloon 'pops' and everyone goes 500?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 2016-04-09 at 11:16 +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The OFBIZ-VM crashed, so the demos were down, restarting...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jacques
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> 
> 


Reply via email to