> > >Modern OSes, office suites or business software. > >Modern guis, with integrated media support, integrated audio/video > >broad- and unicasts, animations, sounds, and so on... > > > >Would you be able to code them with c? Forget it. > > > > > Why wouldn't I? We used to code most anything of importance > in C, yanno, including some pretty fancy stuff.
C++ is not C! Really not! C++ to C is like C to assembler, like java to C++, like modern military jet to ww2 messerschmidt... > > * What's a "modern" language, anyway? What features does a "modern" > language have? I don't think Java is as widely used as it is > because it's interesting or powerful, it was just a better > C++ with marketing. Java is actually the first component-oriented language. But I think we should cut this branch off. It sounds like selling a tractor to a peasant, who just wants to keep his horse, and I'm not that good at selling :-) Regards Leon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
