Did anyone else notice that when Rosemary's baby was born a group of
Japanese tourists went through the apartment where the Little Devil
was laying and took photos?  I almost fell out of my seat laughing at
that one.

On 6/1/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, so *this* is what it's like being the parent of Rosemary's baby!
> 
> I wonder if there has ever been a more OT thread?
> 
> Allow me to summarize all the salient points, and perhaps this thread
> can die peacefully...
> 
> (1) Patterns are good, but don't cram'em in everywhere you have any
> problem to solve.  And if you DO feel the need to cram'em in everywhere,
> I can suggest one other place you should be cramming them.
> 
> (2) OOP is great, but don't give me a 500-class hierarchy to walk.  I
> can comprehend the geometry of a tesseract, but not some of the
> convoluted messes some people spew out just because they read the terms
> inheritance, polymorphism, composition and overloading in some "Teach
> Yourself To Take Someone's Job That Actual Knows Their Ass From Their
> Elbow In 24 Hours" books.
> 
> (2a) Don't give me 5 classes with 5,000 lines of code a piece either!
> Your someone that would use a damned goto if it was implemented!
> 
> (3) If you never did Assembly, you suck (Laugh, damn it!  That's a joke!
>   Ooooooorrrr is it??)
> 
> (4) IDEs are fine, but if you can't do yourself what those 3 buttons you
> just clicked did for you, get outta my shop.  Look, I use a lathe rather
> than widdle the decorative legs on my kitchen chairs, but the point is I
> COULD widdle them if I wanted to.  Using modern development tools is
> much like that.
> 
> (4a) If you can't debug your own damned code without a bouncing ball
> leading you through line-by-line, you have no business writing that code
> in the first place.  I'm not suggesting you HAVE to put a System.out
> after each line of code, but if your relying on the IDE to hold your
> hand to understand what's going on in your own code, hit yourself with a
> hammer, please.
> 
> (5) Much like the Red Sox until their World Series win, LISP proponents
> are never going to stop whining about how great their language of choice
> is until it's king of the hill.  In other words, they're never going to
> stop whining.
> 
> (6) C/C++ creates unmaintainable nightmare code.  If you suck at it.
> Same for Java.  Same for LISP.  Same for Pascal.  Same for ADA.  Same
> for f'ing BASIC.  Anyone see a pattern here?!? (Let me be the first to
> name it: it's Frank Zammetti's "ProgrammersSuckNotLanguages" pattern).
> 
> (7) The Timex Sinclait 1000/ZX81 is the PC we should all have on our
> desktops.  If you want to "multitask", buy two.
> 
> (8) The German version of Outlook is stupid because to us Americans it
> looks like everyone is talking about Root Beer all the time (Review the
> thread... review the thread...)
> 
> (9) Nothing is complex.  There's your Zen moment for the day.
> 
> (10) Corollary to #9: Everything is complex.  Buddhist moment for the day.
> 
> (Zen.  Buddhist.  Zen-Buddhist.  I admit, I don't know what I'm talking
> about!)
> 
> (11) Most of you apparently went to school in the Alps because it seems
> to have snowed a lot and been very uneven ground.  And you did funny
> things with news periodicals.
> 
> (12) Struts 1.3 uses the CoR pattern.  Or maybe it's the IoC pattern.
> Or maybe it's the RTFM pattern.  Could be the WtF pattern.  No one
> knows. (That's another joke... geez, if I have to tell you that I'm
> really not doing a good job, am I?!?)
> 
> (13) Wednesday is the new Friday apparently.
> 
> (14) C is such a lousy language that NOBODY would EVER use it.  Sorry
> Linus, I guess that whole kernel thing of yours was a big mistake.
> Ditto for Windows.  Ditto for Halo.  Ditto for <insert your favorite
> COTS piece of software here more than likely>.  C++ is C with MORE
> chances to blow your foot off.  Again, if you suck.  Conclusion:
> everything should be written in Logo.  I dare say no one has ever
> written a buggy, insecure piece of software in Logo.  Better Logo than
> actually knowing what your doing.  God forbid.
> 
> (15) Everyone has an opinion,  No one is afraid to use it.  This,
> interestingly enough, is the exact opposite of nuclear weapons: few have
> them, everyone is afraid to use them!
> 
> (16) If you ever have a philosophy final where the assignment is simply
> to prove that the chair in the middle of the room exists, write "What
> chair??" in the middle of the paper, hand it in and walk out.  Rejoice
> in your 5-seconds A+.
> 
> Ok, I'm done.  I got a kid bugging me to play Area 51.  Time to get my
> butt kicked.
> 
> Frank
> 
> 
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > Allow me to define a new marker (Way, ) times 3 OT. I have left OT in
> > for existing filters.
> >
> > -Rahul
> >
> > P.S.-
> > 1) I suspect this is how DJ went to programming school [
> > http://www.bedlam.syol.com/ascendin.jpg ]*
> > 2) You can convince the peasant Leon, given gas prices [
> > http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/images/v22/i4/p53_tractor.jpg
> > ]*
> >
> > *[All images copyright respective websites ]
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Frank W. Zammetti
> Founder and Chief Software Architect
> Omnytex Technologies
> http://www.omnytex.com
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


-- 
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to