I have to agree with stanlick with this. I have abandoned in my project the more complex themes of struts and kept it in the "simple" theme (with customized tag templates here and there) because of these "<Table>" tags coming out of nowhere. If you imply a deduction that a <s:form> tag implies in the presence of a <table> and that <s:textfield> are in truth <tr><td>[label]</td><td><input type="text" ... </td></tr> i'm imposing an obsolete html table structure to a page. What if I wanted to use <div> and <span> ? What if I wanted to use a different table structure? (two fields inside a simple <td> tag, for instance ?) Also, is counter-intuitive for html users that a <s:form> actually renders a table, instead of simply render a <form> tag.
As for documentation, I recommend and effort to map the relation between tag x freemarker template so this tag customization becomes easier without having to browse the struts.view.jsp code. Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/03/2007 18:40 Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> To Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org> cc Subject Re: Need more comprehensive AJAX Implementation Instructions --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Also, I have yet to see what an Action class might > actually look like to handle the asynchronous call. It looks like any other Action. (BTW, Tiles is supported in S2 via the Tiles plugin, but Tiles 2 is still a bit fluxful.) d. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
