Let me express interest! I did back-port a number of patches into the 3.3 branch.
C On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we > should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x > code line has stabilized for production use. > > Patrick > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jun >> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list: >>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks, >>> > >>> > Jun >>> > >>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[email protected] >>> >wrote: >>> > >>> >> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but >>> >> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built >>> >> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release! >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the rest >>> >> > because only a single round trip and single commit is required. >>> >> > >>> >> > I would love to hear your results on this. >>> >> > >>> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the >>> batch >>> >> >> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). Has >>> >> >> anybody >>> >> >> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain >>> does >>> >> >> batch >>> >> >> update give? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Thanks >>> >> >> -Raj >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >
