Are there other major developments pending for 3.4 release ? Regards, Dima Gutzeit.
Sent from my iPhone On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:55, Mahadev Konar <[email protected]> wrote: > Dima, > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it? > > thanks > mahadev > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ? >> >> Regards, >> Dima Gutzeit. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM. >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the chroot >>>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining about >>>> the chroot issue in ZK. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Jun >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we >>>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x >>>>> code line has stabilized for production use. >>>>> >>>>> Patrick >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Jun >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list: >>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jun >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu <[email protected] >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, but >>>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We built >>>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the release! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the >>>>> rest >>>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use the >>>>>>> batch >>>>>>>>>>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965). >>>>> Has >>>>>>>>>>> anybody >>>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance gain >>>>>>> does >>>>>>>>>>> batch >>>>>>>>>>> update give? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>> -Raj >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>
