+1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad! On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for fixes only in fix releases. > > Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal. > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Dima, > > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and > > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into > > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it? > > > > thanks > > mahadev > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Dima Gutzeit. > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM. > > >> > > >> Patrick > > >> > > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the > > chroot > > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining > > about > > >>> the chroot issue in ZK. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> > > >>> Jun > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we > > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x > > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use. > > >>>> > > >>>> Patrick > > >>>> > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Jun > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list: > > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Jun > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu < > > [email protected] > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, > > but > > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We > > built > > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the > > release! > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning < > > [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with > the > > >>>> rest > > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N < > [email protected] > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use > > the > > >>>>>> batch > > >>>>>>>>>> operations( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965 > > ). > > >>>> Has > > >>>>>>>>>> anybody > > >>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance > > gain > > >>>>>> does > > >>>>>>>>>> batch > > >>>>>>>>>> update give? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks > > >>>>>>>>>> -Raj > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > > > > >
