+1 for fixes only in fix releases. Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <maha...@hortonworks.com>wrote: > Dima, > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it? > > thanks > mahadev > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit > <dima.gutz...@mailvision.com> wrote: > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ? > > > > Regards, > > Dima Gutzeit. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM. > >> > >> Patrick > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the > chroot > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining > about > >>> the chroot issue in ZK. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Jun > >>> > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until 3.4.x > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use. > >>>> > >>>> Patrick > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>> Jun > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list: > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jun > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu < > d...@midokura.com > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the performance, > but > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We > built > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the > release! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning < > ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with the > >>>> rest > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is required. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N <raj.cassan...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to use > the > >>>>>> batch > >>>>>>>>>> operations(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965 > ). > >>>> Has > >>>>>>>>>> anybody > >>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance > gain > >>>>>> does > >>>>>>>>>> batch > >>>>>>>>>> update give? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>>>>>> -Raj > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > > >
