Having the chroot issue fixed would indeed be great. +1 On Nov 5, 2011 3:05 PM, "Adam Rosien" <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for the chroot fix! Need it bad! > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 for fixes only in fix releases. > > > > Batch is an api change and needs to version change signal. > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Mahadev Konar <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > Dima, > > > Batch is a new feature and touches a lot of the critical code and > > > isnt system tested. I dont think it would be advisable to include into > > > a stable bugfix release for now. What do others feel abt it? > > > > > > thanks > > > mahadev > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dima Gutzeit > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Can we have batch operation as well included in that release ? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Dima Gutzeit. > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > > On 27 באוק 2011, at 18:20, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Great, I'll propose a 3.3.4 release to the PMC, with myself as RM. > > > >> > > > >> Patrick > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> I'd like to have a 3.3.4 release too, especially for addressing the > > > chroot > > > >>> issue (ZOOKEEPER-961). We have seen several Kafka users complaining > > > about > > > >>> the chroot issue in ZK. > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks, > > > >>> > > > >>> Jun > > > >>> > > > >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> I've offered but no one showed any interest. I personally think we > > > >>>> should have one/more, including the most important fixes until > 3.4.x > > > >>>> code line has stabilized for production use. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Patrick > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >>>>> Is there going to be a 3.3.4 release? > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Jun > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Voting is currently under way on the dev list: > > > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/tpqkq57kl7tcp7xn > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jun Rao <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >>>>>>> Hi, > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Has the release date for ZK 3.4 be determined? Thanks, > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Jun > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Dan Mihai Dumitriu < > > > [email protected] > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> We are using that function now as well, not for the > performance, > > > but > > > >>>>>>>> for the atomicity property. It is incredibly convenient! We > > > built > > > >>>>>>>> our own package, but we're definitely looking forward to the > > > release! > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Ted Dunning < > > > [email protected]> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> Performance was never the goal, but it might come along with > > the > > > >>>> rest > > > >>>>>>>>> because only a single round trip and single commit is > required. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I would love to hear your results on this. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Raj N < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Whats the release date for Zookeeper 3.4? I would like to > use > > > the > > > >>>>>> batch > > > >>>>>>>>>> operations( > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965 > > > ). > > > >>>> Has > > > >>>>>>>>>> anybody > > > >>>>>>>>>> done any benchmarking on this one? How much of a performance > > > gain > > > >>>>>> does > > > >>>>>>>>>> batch > > > >>>>>>>>>> update give? > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks > > > >>>>>>>>>> -Raj > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
