to disable throttling  set value to 0. Still have to restart all VR, VM
related..

You should be able to max out your network capacity or VR capacity...





On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Good one :)
> Motty, also, can you ogin to VR as I suggested, and install iperf there,
> and just benchmark from VR to one of the VMs ? Just to see if number
> differs at all.. I'm not into Xen at all - but I also guess VR for Xen has
> para-virtualizes drivers inside....  Just for your comparison of emulated
> vs para-virtualized drivers, my test case: 2 VMs (both on same physical
> host!) emulated intel NICs - iperf gives arround 1.2 Gbps. Same setup,
> virtio NICs - iperf gives 8.9Gbps - default iperf options, no tuning
> nothings...
>
> On 3 December 2014 at 06:16, Vadim Kimlaychuk <vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee>
> wrote:
>
> > Motty,
> >
> >       I would ask even more stupid question than Andrija did --- do you
> > have 100Mb physical network? 200Mb seems to be exactly double of this (as
> > NIC working in full duplex) and VR and VMs may be on different hosts. So
> > you can't physically have more than that :)
> >
> > Vadim
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Motty Cruz [motty.c...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 20:50
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: ACS 4.4.1 network.throttling.rate - Advance Zone- XenServer
> > 6.2
> >
> > Hi Andrija,
> >
> > yes I do have Xen para-virtualize tools installed, load on the VR CPU is
> > very low. I have about 6 VMs in this network not much traffic.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Motty
> > On 12/02/2014 07:40 AM, Andrija Panic wrote:
> > > Stupid question - are you using xen para-virtualized drivers in those
> > VMs ?
> > > Also, if you can log into VR (use console proxy, then root/password to
> > > login) - and check the router CPU load etc ?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2 December 2014 at 16:29, Motty Cruz <motty.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I set vm.network.throttling.rate and network.throttling.rate to 1024
> and
> > >> System offering leave it null, but no success:
> > >>
> > >> [ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
> > >> [  4]  0.0-60.0 sec  1.14 GBytes   162 Mbits/sec
> > >> [  5]  0.0-60.0 sec  1.27 GBytes   182 Mbits/sec
> > >>
> > >> bandwidth won't go over 200MB. please help!
> > >>
> > >> -Motty
> > >>
> > >> On 12/01/2014 01:35 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Motty,
> > >>> do you want to keep the network throttling but add more throughput or
> > want
> > >>> to disable to have max network throughput as possible?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> *Pierre-Luc DION*
> > >>> Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
> > >>> t 855.652.5683
> > >>>
> > >>> *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
> > >>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> > >>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Motty Cruz <motty.c...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>   Thanks Pierre-Luc, Geoff,
> > >>>> both vm.network.throttling.rate and network.throttling.rate are set
> to
> > >>>> 1024, also, Systems Compute for the router has Network rate set to
> > 1024.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> after all setting were change restart VR, I even restarted network,
> > >>>> cloudstack-management and even the two VMs i'm testing network
> > >>>> performance,
> > >>>> but it does not go over 200MB.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'm not sure what else to try;
> > >>>> - Motty
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 12/01/2014 01:09 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>   As Geoff is saying and you also need to restart VRs. and Instance
> if
> > >>>>> vm.network.throttling.rate
> > >>>>> was changed
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> *Pierre-Luc DION*
> > >>>>> Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
> > >>>>> t 855.652.5683
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions
> Experts
> > >>>>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> > >>>>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Geoff Higginbottom <
> > >>>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>    Motty,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> It’s the vm.network.throttling.rate you need to change OR the
> > Network
> > >>>>>> Rate
> > >>>>>> on the Compute offering your VMs are using.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Regards
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Geoff Higginbottom
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>> From: Motty Cruz [mailto:motty.c...@gmail.com]
> > >>>>>> Sent: 01 December 2014 18:41
> > >>>>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; motty.c...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>> Subject: ACS 4.4.1 network.throttling.rate - Advance Zone-
> XenServer
> > >>>>>> 6.2
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi all, I notice transfer rate between VMs in same network is
> about
> > >>>>>> 20MB.
> > >>>>>> In Globol settings I set
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> network.throttling.rate= 1024
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> did a transfer test, rate still the same, any ideas? suggestions?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>> Motty
> > >>>>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> > >>>>>> services
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> > >>>>>> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> > >>>>>> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.
> > >>>>>> com/csforge/>
> > >>>>>> CloudStack Consulting<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> > >>>>>> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> > >>>>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> > >>>>>> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> > >>>>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> > >>>>>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> > >>>>>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> > >>>>>> intended
> > >>>>>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any
> > views
> > >>>>>> or
> > >>>>>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
> > >>>>>> necessarily
> > >>>>>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are
> > not
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>>>>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action
> > >>>>>> based
> > >>>>>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact
> the
> > >>>>>> sender
> > >>>>>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue
> Ltd
> > >>>>>> is a
> > >>>>>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India
> > LLP
> > >>>>>> is
> > >>>>>> a
> > >>>>>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from
> > Shape
> > >>>>>> Blue
> > >>>>>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated
> in
> > >>>>>> Brasil
> > >>>>>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA
> Pty
> > Ltd
> > >>>>>> is
> > >>>>>> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded
> > >>>>>> under
> > >>>>>> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>

Reply via email to