Hi Abishek,

Have you tested with qemu-kvm-ev instead of qemu-kvm ?

-Wei

On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 10:00, Abishek <abckd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Wei,
>
> I am very grateful for your response. In my test environment I first
> created a service offering of Custom Constrained (minCore=1, maxCore=10,
> minRam=1GB, maxRam=12GB, CPUSpeed=2000) with dynamic scaling enabled. But
> every time I tried to start the VM under this ServiceOffering I got the
> above mentioned error. Please find the following agent log for that
> particular VM:
>
> https://controlc.com/4618c4d8
>
> HOST OS : Centos 7.9
> QEMU:   QEMU emulator version 1.5.3 (qemu-kvm-1.5.3-175.el7_9.4), Copyright
> (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard
>
> And I think the error seems to be with the service offering (Custom
> Constrained). So, I created two Fixed services offering A(1 core and 1GB)
> and B(2 Core and 2 GB) with dynamic scaling enabled. I then built a VM
> based on service offering A and the VM started(finally). But I did not find
> any option to scale the VM while it's running. I was only able to scale the
> VM to shutdown state.
>
> Thank You.
>
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 13:11, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Abishek,
> >
> > I guess the error is same as before:
> >
> > qemu: invalid ram size: size=4194304k,slots=16,maxmem=1583660032k
> >
> >
> > What are your hypervisor/qemu version and guest OS version ?
> > Can you check agent.log and share the xml definition of the vm ?
> >
> > -Wei
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 05:18, Abishek Budhathoki <abckd...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Wei,
> > >
> > > I have also tested with limited service offering where max RAM is 12GB
> > and
> > > CPU is 12 core. But the result is the same. I can not start the VM. But
> > if
> > > I turn off Dynamic Scaling to Off on Advance Mode while creating the
> > > instance I can start the VM.
> > >
> > > Thank You.
> > >
> > > On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 20:50, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The max ram looks very huge. It would be better to double check the
> > > > offerings.
> > > >
> > > > "minRam":"(4.00 GB) 4294967296","maxRam":"(1.4749 TB) 1621666836480"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -Wei
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 15:21, Abishek Budhathoki <abckd...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > HI Daniel,
> > > > >
> > > > > Extremely glad to hear that dynamic scaling is now supported in
> KVM.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is no issue of resources. I cannot start a VM with dynamic
> > > scaling
> > > > > enabled template and service offering. But I am able to start other
> > > VMs.
> > > > I
> > > > > have shared the logs on
> > > > >
> > > > > https://controlc.com/204f727d
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank You
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 16:51, Abishek Budhathoki <
> abckd...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have just upgraded my Cloudstack installation from 4.15 to 4.16
> > and
> > > > > > everything is working as expected. In the docs site(Changes in
> > > 4.16.0.0
> > > > > > since 4.15) I have seen that dynamic Scaling with KVM now works
> > with
> > > > > > Cloudstack 4.16(github #4878 Support vm dynamic scaling with
> kvm).
> > Is
> > > > > this
> > > > > > true? I have tried to test this but was unsuccessful. Changed
> > > > > > global setting enable dynamic scaling to true, created template
> > with
> > > > > > dynamic scaling support, created service offering that supports
> > > dynamic
> > > > > > Scaling.
> > > > > > I only see the following error:
> > > > > > ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher]
> > (API-Job-Executor-12:ctx-bb24d685
> > > > > > job-2304) (logid:394001c9) Unexpected exception while executing
> > > > > > org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.DeployVMCmdByAdmin
> > > > > > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to start
> a
> > VM
> > > > due
> > > > > > to insufficient capacity
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If it's not still supported please discard this email.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank You.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to