Hi all,

I've tested the dynamic scaling with qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev. Here are the
results for both with "Custom constrained" compute offering:

qemu-kvm-ev
deploy VM - passed
scale VM - passed

qemu-kvm
deploy VM - failed with the same error (org.libvirt.LibvirtException:
internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor: qemu: invalid
ram size: size=524288k,slots=16,maxmem=4194304k)
scale VM on existing VM - passed

Best regards,
Slavka

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 6:12 AM Abishek <abckd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks a lot Wei for helping out. I will first try it in the Ubuntu
> environment.
>
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 00:09, Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Great, thanks Daniel.
> >
> > Abishek, now it seems you need to install qemu-kvm-ev for testing the
> > feature.
> >
> > -Wei
> >
> > On Thursday, 18 November 2021, Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador <
> > dvsalvador...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Abishek, Wei, I tested this feature with Ubuntu 20.04 + KVM. Some
> > > community members tested with CentOS7 and qemu-kvm-ev and it worked.
> > Also,
> > > as live snapshots and live migrations, hotplug memory is a known
> > limitation
> > > of qemu-kvm. I cannot give you advice regarding this replacement too,
> as
> > I
> > > do not use CentOS. Best regards, Daniel Salvador
> > >
> > > On 17/11/2021 09:07, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Abishek,
> > >>
> > >> I cannot give your advice on it as I did not install qemu-kvm-ev to
> > >> replace
> > >> qemu-kvm before.
> > >>
> > >> I suspect that the issue you faced is caused by qemu-kvm. qemu-kvm-ev
> > >> supports more advanced features than qemu-kvm.
> > >>
> > >> cc @Daniel, what hypervisor did you use to test the dynamic scaling ?
> > >>
> > >> -Wei
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Abishek<abckd...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> HI Wei,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have not tested with qemu-kvm-ev. I am willing to try but what
> > >>> effect will it have on my existing setup when I install qemu-kvm-ev
> in
> > my
> > >>> existing qemu-kvm. Should I have to remove qemu-kvm and install
> > >>> qemu-kvm-ev? In the previous test I was able to start the machine
> with
> > >>> Fixed Offering but the option for Scaling the VM in UI was not
> present
> > >>> while the VM was in running state but was available when the VM was
> in
> > >>> shutdown state only.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank You.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 15:23, Wei ZHOU<ustcweiz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi Abishek,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Have you tested with qemu-kvm-ev instead of qemu-kvm ?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -Wei
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 10:00, Abishek<abckd...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hello Wei,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I am very grateful for your response. In my test environment I
> first
> > >>>>> created a service offering of Custom Constrained (minCore=1,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> maxCore=10,
> > >>>
> > >>>> minRam=1GB, maxRam=12GB, CPUSpeed=2000) with dynamic scaling
> enabled.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> But
> > >>>
> > >>>> every time I tried to start the VM under this ServiceOffering I got
> > the
> > >>>>> above mentioned error. Please find the following agent log for that
> > >>>>> particular VM:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> https://controlc.com/4618c4d8
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> HOST OS : Centos 7.9
> > >>>>> QEMU:   QEMU emulator version 1.5.3 (qemu-kvm-1.5.3-175.el7_9.4),
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> Copyright
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> And I think the error seems to be with the service offering (Custom
> > >>>>> Constrained). So, I created two Fixed services offering A(1 core
> and
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> 1GB)
> > >>>
> > >>>> and B(2 Core and 2 GB) with dynamic scaling enabled. I then built a
> VM
> > >>>>> based on service offering A and the VM started(finally). But I did
> > not
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> find
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> any option to scale the VM while it's running. I was only able to
> > scale
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> VM to shutdown state.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thank You.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 13:11, Wei ZHOU<ustcweiz...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Hi Abishek,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I guess the error is same as before:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> qemu: invalid ram size: size=4194304k,slots=16,maxmem=1583660032k
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> What are your hypervisor/qemu version and guest OS version ?
> > >>>>>> Can you check agent.log and share the xml definition of the vm ?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -Wei
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 05:18, Abishek Budhathoki <
> > abckd...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hello Wei,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I have also tested with limited service offering where max RAM is
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 12GB
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> and
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> CPU is 12 core. But the result is the same. I can not start the
> VM.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> But
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> if
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I turn off Dynamic Scaling to Off on Advance Mode while creating
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>>
> > >>>> instance I can start the VM.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thank You.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 20:50, Wei ZHOU<ustcweiz...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> The max ram looks very huge. It would be better to double check
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>
> > >>>> offerings.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> "minRam":"(4.00 GB) 4294967296","maxRam":"(1.4749 TB)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 1621666836480"
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> -Wei
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 15:21, Abishek Budhathoki <
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> abckd...@gmail.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> HI Daniel,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Extremely glad to hear that dynamic scaling is now supported in
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> KVM.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> There is no issue of resources. I cannot start a VM with
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> dynamic
> > >>>
> > >>>> scaling
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> enabled template and service offering. But I am able to start
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> other
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> VMs.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> have shared the logs on
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> https://controlc.com/204f727d
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thank You
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 16:51, Abishek Budhathoki <
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> abckd...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I have just upgraded my Cloudstack installation from 4.15 to
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> 4.16
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> and
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> everything is working as expected. In the docs site(Changes
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>
> > >>>> 4.16.0.0
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> since 4.15) I have seen that dynamic Scaling with KVM now
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> works
> > >>>
> > >>>> with
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Cloudstack 4.16(github #4878 Support vm dynamic scaling with
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> kvm).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Is
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> true? I have tried to test this but was unsuccessful. Changed
> > >>>>>>>>>> global setting enable dynamic scaling to true, created
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> template
> > >>>
> > >>>> with
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> dynamic scaling support, created service offering that
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> supports
> > >>>
> > >>>> dynamic
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Scaling.
> > >>>>>>>>>> I only see the following error:
> > >>>>>>>>>> ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher]
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> (API-Job-Executor-12:ctx-bb24d685
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> job-2304) (logid:394001c9) Unexpected exception while
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> executing
> > >>>
> > >>>> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.DeployVMCmdByAdmin
> > >>>>>>>>>> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> start
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> a
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> VM
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> due
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> to insufficient capacity
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> If it's not still supported please discard this email.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thank You.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >
>

Reply via email to