Andreas Säger wrote: > > The myth of an MS Office clone is by far more frustrating because it > waists a lot of time with very unproductive experiments. This is not a > question of partisanship. People should use whatever software works for > them. >
This is not a matter of being a clone. If a user or company wants to migrate (and I believe that TDF and LO want that in spite of your personal opinion) from MS Office to LO they need to be able to convert their existing documents. Companies and individuals using LO must be able to send documents to users who can't (or do not want) to use LO. I think that your comments and e-letter's were most unfortunate. That is not the spirit of a Free (as in beer and in speech) software project. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Default-file-save-format-to-MSOffice-doc-xls-ppt-etc-tp3386983p3389376.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
