Hi :)
It's just a "just for fun" survey of what people think they use.

The modules can't be split up and removing any wouldn't reduce the
code=base by much at all so the usual sinister hidden-agendas behind this
sort of question are entirely absent.  It's just for fun.

For a lot of us this sort of thing is very difficult because answering
would require us have really measured usage and give accurate answers
rather than guesses.  It's the type of question that neurotypicals and
mainstream-press articles seem to enjoy but that are ultimately fairly
pointless.  It's just for fun and it's interesting to see people's
estimates of what they do and to see how they handle giving answers to this
sort of thing.
http://musingsofanaspie.com/2013/01/10/what-is-neurotypical/

If we wanted a formal vote then there are various tools such as "Survey
Monkey", or we could set-up something in LinuxQuestions.Org" or "Ask LO" or
somewhere.
Regards from
Tom :)


On 13 May 2014 06:06, Tom Cloyd <tomcloydm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 05/11/2014 03:53 PM, Virgil Arrington wrote:
>
>> I'm curious to find out what components of LO are used most by the
>> people on this list. I think it helps to know different folks' area of
>> experience. It might also help us in learning new ways to integrate
>> the different components. For myself, my approximate usage is:
>>
>> Writer     (85% of my use of LO)
>> Calc        (10%)
>> Impress  (3%, Maybe four to five presentations a year)
>> Base       (once a year to print out labels for my Christmas cards)
>> Draw      (What's that?)
>>
>> Virgil
>>
>>
>>
>>  Virgil,
>
> I have a considerable background in inferential statistics, and have done
> formal survey research, in a variety of social and cultural contexts. I
> want to warn you that this sort of self-select, opt-in survey is NOT the
> way to go, if your question is serious.
>
> You ARE only going to get a subset (sample) of your population of
> interest, and you'll have no way to relate that subset to the population,
> thus no way to draw any valid conclusions from the subset. It's
> pseudo-research, which creates the impression of creating knowledge without
> actually doing so.
>
> Just something for you, and others, to think about.
>
> Hope it's helpful.
>
> Tom
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Tom Cloyd, MS MA (LMHC, WA State)
> Cedar City / St. George, UT, U.S.A: (435) 272-3332
> * << t...@tomcloyd.com >> (email) << TomCloyd.com >> (website)
> * Sleight of Mind blog: Sleightmind.com (mental health issues)
> * Founder: Google+ Trauma and Dissociation Education and Advocacy community
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
> Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-
> unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
> deleted
>
>

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to