On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:26 AM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Covener wrote: > [...] >> >> IMO The 403 is returned in a path where errors imply a high likelyhood >> of someone actively trying to fool the server -- I don't think a 403 >> is too inappropriate here. >> > First, no, there was no tomfoolery implicated in copying the file. Just > take an existing Apache logo image file and copy it from the Unix > command-line.
> Or copy the file to the system from a Windows PC using any utility like FTP > or SCP. > > On the system, the result of an "ls" of that file looks like this : > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2326 2004-11-20 21:16 joaquín.gif > To show the bytes comprising the filename: ls -1 *.gif | od -t x1 > with the locale of that user being > LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15 That matches the "locale" of the bytes in your request. > Next, nothing personal implied, but what you are saying above is a > singularly mono-cultural point of view. Why would a path composed entirely > of printable characters of the latin iso-8859-1 alphabet imply a high > likelihood of someone trying to fool the server ? I was referring to errors in this particular code-path (not path in the URI) through Apache. > So if I try to allow Apache to serve documents from my home directory > /home/andré/public_html, I should trigger 403 errors ? No -- why would it? -- Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] " from the digest: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
