On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> > On 01/15/2014 08:29 PM, Claude Morin wrote: > > Please note that this is not a complaint. It's more a check of my > sanity and a hope to be pointed in the right direction :-). > > I'm unable to find Windows binaries for 2.2.26; only 2.2.25 is available > at apache.org and on all mirrors. I searched the FAQ and the mailing > list archive and the only relevant thing I found is (emphasis mine): > > Q. Why isn't there a binary for my platform? > A. ...The sole exception to these practices is the Windows package. Unlike > most Unix and Unix-like platforms, > Windows systems do not come with a bundled software development > environment, so we do prepare binary kits for > Windows when we make a release. Again, however, it's a voluntary thing and > only a limited number of the developers > have the capability to build the InstallShield package, so the *Windows > release may lag somewhat *behind the source > release. This *lag should be no more than a few days at most*. > > On a related note, I also noticed that no Windows binary exists for the > 2.4 branch, not even an old version. > > > Please see http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/platform/windows.html#down > > There are several well-trusted third-parties that provide Windows > binaries. You should try one of them. (There are also several > not-as-well-trusted third-parties that provide Windows binaries. I didn't > list them on that page.) > Cool... I've updated the FAQ to point to that list. ( https://wiki.apache.org/httpd/FAQ#Why_isn.27t_there_a_current_binary_for_my_platform.3F ) > > > -- > Rich Bowenrbowen@rcbowen.comhttp://rcbowen.com/ > > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
