>> If Fuseki would have had (like Virtuoso) a reference public endpoint with a >> well known database, then were no need for such a question...
This sounds like an interesting idea. Do you have some time to devote to it? What database are you thinking of serving? --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library > On Apr 4, 2017, at 4:48 AM, baran...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 14:54:53 +0200, javed khan <javedbtk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Why we need fuseki server in semantic web applications. We can run SPARQL >> queries without it, like we do using Jena syntax. > > If Fuseki would have had (like Virtuoso) a reference public endpoint with a > well known database, then were no need for such a question... > > baran > > -- > Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
