This sounds like an interesting idea. Do you have some time to devote to
it? What database are you thinking of serving?
Well, we can take the same as Virtuoso, Dbpedia-dataset, THE BEST would be
EXACTLY the same as Virtuoso to make comparisons, but this is an old
'idea' of mine, here in this listing about 5-6 years old, i think...
thanks, baran
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
On Apr 4, 2017, at 4:48 AM, [email protected] wrote:
On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 14:54:53 +0200, javed khan <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi
Why we need fuseki server in semantic web applications. We can run
SPARQL
queries without it, like we do using Jena syntax.
If Fuseki would have had (like Virtuoso) a reference public endpoint
with a well known database, then were no need for such a question...
baran
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
