On Apr 4, 2017, at 10:03 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> I've got nothing against DBPedia, although I don't think it's particularly >> useful to make a comparison in that way between Virtuoso and Jena, unless >> you are ready to do the work to ensure that the actual resourcing for the >> two services is the same, forever. > > what kind of problems do you see, i have a local Fuseki server running > downloaded nt-Dbpedia datasets, which i regulary actualize.
That doesn't really help anyone compare Jena and Virtuoso, does it? :) >> Where would you be serving this data from? Do you have perhaps employer >> backing or other long-term backing for this? > > Such a service should be A REFERENCE PUBLIC ENDPOINT run by Jena Develepoment > like Virtuoso runs it with Dbpedia, but Jena Team can take another dataset > ofcourse. Is there now such a A REFERENCE PUBLIC ENDPOINT running by Jena > Team? If you think, this is not necessary, then ok... I'm sorry, I am a bit confused; are you able to volunteer some time or resources to this purpose? What you would like the Jena team to do to help _you_ implement this idea? --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library
