On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:02:44 +0200, "G�schl,Siegfried" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Tomasz, > > It is actually very convenient to supply a project specific log4j.properties since > this is the vey first one to be found regardless of any other log4j.properties found > in JARs
Yes, I know. And that's why I'm not sure if it's the best idea to package classes into jar file during building war file. I understand that it might be useful in case of huge set of small classes but generally packaging classes in 'war' project into jar during build war file may leads to problems. So, it there'll be such possibilty in 'war' plugin - please, make it not-default. Regards, Tomek > Cheers, > > Siegfried Goeschl > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tomasz Pik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Montag, 28. Juni 2004 15:03 > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:53:45 -0400, Brill Pappin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm sure some of us would prefer to keep the WEB-INF/classes dir, so > > my suggestion would be to include a switch property that would allow > > the user to use one or the other. > > Here's one reason: servlet specs define, that classes from WEB-INF/classes are > loaded before WEB-INF/lib so this may be used as some kind of 'overloading', for > example for classes from 'third party' libraries (I know it's ugly but it's possible > due to spec). > > Regards, > Tomek > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
