Walter / Gj, One of the problems with running multiple versions of Java on Windows is the inclusion of the following on the path (as I wrote up earlier):
C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Oracle\Java\javapath This MUST be removed from the PATH environment variable otherwise you will see errors like those reported in the log. I just ran the OpenJFX sample from NetBeans 11.1 using Maven and OpenJDK 11.0.4. It ran as expected with no errors. . . . . just my two cents /mde/ On 9/28/2019 12:31 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Yup, it seems to me that the Java environment isn't set up right -- some > JDK 8 of some kind appears to be set up system wide. > > Running 'java -version' would probably confirm that. > > Gj > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 9:29 PM Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, 28 Sep 2019, 19:28 Walter Oney, <walter.o...@oneylaw.com> wrote: >> >>> Sure it does. You just didn't see the stackoverflow thread where I got >>> help installing JNA, which I need as part of my app. I wandered down the >>> rathole of newer JDK versions trying to solve the problem. I'm back to >>> being a happy bunny now that I've reverted to JDK 8. >>> >> >> Well, I don't think you linked to the thread! ;-) What I meant was that >> JNA isn't relevant to getting a working OpenJFX sample on your system. I >> get that it's a library dependency of your app. >> >> JavaFX was never, strictly, part of the JDK. But was sometimes shipped >> with it. From JavaFX 8 to OpenJFX 11 is a shift, you need to treat it as a >> library dependency like you're doing with JNA. Unfortunately sticking with >> JDK 8 and JavaFX 8 is unlikely a good long term strategy. >> >> >>> As I said I would, I'm attaching the log from trying to run >>> HelloFXWithMaven. I would like to return to my regularly scheduled nap. I >>> realize that I'm probably cutting myself off from getting any help in the >>> future, but I'm massively sleep deprived and have no choice today. >> >> >> No, you're not. Just come back to it when suits you. We're usually a >> friendly bunch of volunteers here. :-) >> >> The thing that strikes me in that log is the error on --module-path. >> Sounds like something in the build is still picking up Java 8 somewhere? >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Neil >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
