James Knott wrote:
> Jack Gates wrote:
>   
>> Actually the decisions were incredibly smart because they secured 
>> their hold on the mass of people who don't know any better and don't 
>> care.  Those same people will just go buy all the other software to 
>> try to secure the system.  Microsoft has a very good marketing 
>> campaign I just don't agree with their deceptive procedures behind it 
>> and I don't like their software.  I stopped using their software 4 
>> years ago and won't go back to it.  I like Linux too much! Here is my 
>> take on the MS stuff http://www.jlgates.com
>>
>>     
>
> I was using VAX/VMS before I was using DOS.  I was using OS/2, before I
> ever used Windows.  I knew about good computing first and then was
> easily able to recognize trash when I saw it.  Windows has never been my
> home OS and I've also been able to avoid it for a significant part of my
> career.  I have also worked for IBM proving support for OS/2 and Windows
> and there is absolutely no doubt that, from a technical standpoint,
> Windows is crap.
>
>   
James:

I am of the same line.  However, at the end of the day, Windows gives me
a paycheck.

I have used:

DOS +Windows 3.1 and 3.11
Windows 95
Windows 98 + Windows 98SE
Windows XP
OS/2 2.0 +2.1
OS/2 Warp (3.0) + 4.0
Linux (several distributions and Kernels 2.2 + 2.4 +2.6)
Mac OS X 10.3 + 10.4 (Currently using this)

At work:
Windows through Windows server 2003 SP 1
Solaris 8, 9 and 10
Linux (various distros mostly RH based.)

And in case anyone asks, I cannot use 'freeware' including OpenOffice at
work in an official capacity.

James McKenzie

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to