Matt Kettler wrote on Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:43:01 -0400: > Chris S reported his spamd swelling to 45mb with a huge version of > bigevil.cf he was testing. >
The latest bigevil.cf needs about 40 - 50 MB *alone*! Together with several SARE rules our spamd processes were around 90 MB lately. That's where I removed bigevil (and activated SURBL on 3.0) and that other big ruleset (don't remember the name at the moment), so that our spamd prcess is now about 50 MB. I didn't see much difference in detection on the 2.63 systems, so bigevil is simply not worth the huge memory consumption. Kai -- Kai Sch�tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
