On Sunday, October 17, 2004, 8:04:10 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > Jeff Chan wrote:
> > That said, it sounds like your installation may be messed up > > since init.pre was missing. > init.pre wasn't missing; the .sample was there since it should be > modified to suit the admin's needs and then put in place. *I* did > something wrong; the port/package is fine. OK. >> If the default configs, which use urirhssub are not already > > in place as a result of the installation, then that's something > > else that may have gone wrong. > Ah ha! I think the urirhssub defaults *are* in place because the -D > shows use of multi.surbl.org, which was odd to me because I had > specified sc.surbl.org (instead of multi) in local.cf. > So it looks like I now need to know what the appropriate 'score' > variable are. Thanks for the clarification. Default scores should be ok. The default configuration should have rules and scores already in place. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
