From: "Nicolas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: 2004 November, 28, Sunday 02:12
Subject: Re: reply from sorbs
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 10:11:12AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > if I did not miss anything in this thread, the victim HAS a static IP on
the cable/dsl link and
> > pays more for the access than dynamic ip would cost with the same
provider.
> > The provider, however, reports a full ip block (which may have a few
percent of
> > static ip's) as dialup.
> > I believe the extra money they get on the fixed ip should allow them to
> > - either report correctly or
> > - create a mail relay where authenticated users can use their own domain
name as sender
> >
> > Wolfgang Hamann
>
> I think he has a dynamic IP over a DSL line. That's what I understood.
> Am I wrong?
>
> Nicolas, Paris.
So because he is on an address block listed as dialup he gets no chance
to issue an SPF for his site. Ah well.
{o.o}
