Riccardo Alfieri skrev den 2020-07-23 17:01:
On 23/07/20 16:53, Benny Pedersen wrote:
so rspamd cant make support to spamassassin rules without permission
to change rules names ?, but thay
did, wonderfull world of help each other
I think that rspamd's approach is correct.
i am not a jura student :=)
Rspamd just takes SA rules
and use them.
yes its read native sa rules, and hope it can on read transfer it to a
rspamd view in ucl
It doesn't provide the rules, meaning that you most
likely need to have an installation of at least sa-update on the same
machine that runs rspamd to keep rules updated.
if the need is to have its updated yes, but sa can have static rules for
ever :=)
SA rules are also distributed under Apache 2.0 license and I guess
that license permits reuse of existing code in other projects, but
IANAL :)
yes i think if mimedefang was so good it would have being more
dokumented, as i see it to much was done in mimedefang and not
implemented in spamassassin, so all was needed to have a non working
problems with mimedefang, thats imho why its dead beaf now ?
basicly i am just happy that fuglu exists now
