On 11/20/2020 4:37 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
It seems spammers are using political arguments to justify their actions. I'll give them credit, at least they're trying to justify what they do by something greater than (outside of) themselves, albeit wrongly. It seems people on this side of the argument want to jettison politics (and religion) and have no justification (only personal preference) for what they do. Curious! At the core spammers seem more logically consistent than those who oppose them.
I have extremely large amounts of spams on file in my spamtrap spam collection from all various political viewpoints, political parties, and moral/ethical/religious viewpoints - MANY of them think that THEIR greater good justifies spamming, and ironically their beliefs are often in 100% contradiction to OTHER spammers who have opposite beliefs, but likewise think that their spam is justified by THEIR "greater good". Thankfully, it isn't my job to determine who is justified and, instead, I believe that NONE of them are justified in sending spam - spam is about *consent* - NOT *content*.
-- Rob McEwen, invaluement
