On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:50:49PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 11:48:52AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > > > >> >https://pastebin.com/s032ndrA
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >It's not only hitting DMARC_REJ_NO_DKIM and DMARC_FAIL_REJECT, but
> > > > >>
> > > > >> where did you get these from?
> > > >
> > > > On 22.04.22 10:02, Alex wrote:
> > > > >I just realized these are from my local rules, put together from a
> > > > >conversation many years ago, apparently from before SA had built-in
> > > > >DMARC support.
> > > > >
> > > > >https://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg95643.html
> >
> > > > now I really wonder why these aren't part of stock SA rules.
> >
> > On 24.04.22 14:39, Alex wrote:
> > > Does this mean you are investigating further?
> >
> > not me, as I'm not involved in SA deployment more than by being active here.
> > perhaps you could fill a wishlist report...
> >
> > > Are these rules from the link above useful?
> >
> > looks like they are. KAM.cf contains similar rules, but having them in stock
> > SA would be nice.
>
> Soon released 4.0.0 already has a dedicated DMARC plugin, such rules should
> become obsolete. Testers would be appreciated..
>
KAM.cf has already all the needed glue, if you update to trunk and enable DMARC
plugin, DMARC rules will use new plugin code.
Giovannin
