On 2/14/2023 6:09 PM, joe a wrote:
Please let this sit for a while, I've discovered a fundamental issue with my scheme of feeding messages to BAYES.  Unfortunately I was remiss, apparently, it setting up logging for some bits, so have no idea how long this has been failing.

Sorry for the clutter.

joe a.


Re-energized having recently heroically wrestled an elusive issue (to me) into surrender . . . we now turn to another issue.

Probably I need to retrain BAYES "From scratch". I have a mess (years?) of stored sample emails that and be relearned.

I understand that sa-learn should be run as the same user as spamd, however I find it has always been run as root and when running as the spamassassin user results in errors, such as:

~su -c "sa-learn --spam /var/mail/spamd/Cabinet.Missed-SPAM" spamfilter

results in errors, starting with:

plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC): Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SpamCop.pm: lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SpamCop.pm: Permission denied at (eval 44) line 1.

plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC): Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/AutoLearnThreshold.pm: lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/AutoLearnThreshold.pm: Permission denied at (eval 45) line 1.

One might presume this to be a permissions issue (where would I get THAT idea?) but permissions to what? As I cannot seem to find the items mentioned even as root.

Running with the -D option does produce more, after that list of permission denied items

Feb 16 15:55:30.884 [10384] dbg: config: warning: no description set for STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES Feb 16 15:55:30.884 [10384] dbg: config: warning: no description set for MSOE_MID_WRONG_CASE Feb 16 15:55:30.884 [10384] dbg: config: warning: no description set for HELO_FRIEND Feb 16 15:55:30.884 [10384] dbg: config: warning: no description set for STOX_AND_PRICE Feb 16 15:55:30.884 [10384] dbg: config: warning: no description set for L_SPAM_TOOL_13 Feb 16 15:55:30.885 [10384] dbg: config: warning: no description set for FSL_FAKE_HOTMAIL_RVCD

Means something to someone I guess.


Reply via email to