On 2023-02-17 at 22:41:05 UTC-0500 (Fri, 17 Feb 2023 19:41:05 -0800)
Loren Wilton <lwil...@earthlink.net>
is rumored to have said:
They receive wildly different BAYES scores.
* -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.0002]
* 2.2 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20%
* [score: 0.0881]
This looks like you have per-user Bayes databases, and the messaage
type has been trained differently in each.
Also, it looks like there are per-user rules, since BAYES_50 has a
normal score of 0.2, and there is no reason BAYES_20 (indicating much
less spammy) should have a score of 2.2.
Absolutely correct.
However, that does not prove definitively that there are per-user Bayes
DBs & rules, just that the BAYES_20 score is insane. The difference
between 8.81% and 00.02% isn't very meaningful. It isn't accidental that
SA doesn't have finer categories of Bayes scores.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
