Hi!
The conventional RBLS all have much lower scores than the URIBLs. It
takes the top 5 RBLs to match the score of the top 3 surbl.org lists.
For this reason Multi-listing in multiple RBLs rarely causes as hefty a
score problem as URIBLs. I'd be very happy if the URIBL scores were more
similar to the RBL scores.
While multi-listing is somewhat common in RBLs, it's the vast majority
of cases in URIBLs. Over 50% of my mail that hits any surbl.org lists
hits 3 or more of them.
I dont agree here. Things change, scores do change also. What percentage
of spam is hit by a regular RBL, on your system, and what percentage is
hit by a URIBL? On my end its really the URLBI stuff that throws out the
spams. Most regular RBL stuff is somewhat obsolete. With all the botnets.
Perhaps i get early spams but the Spamcop lists and so on dont score much
first fresh runs now days.
#1 183613 PROLO_LEO5
#2 163666 BAYES_99
#3 145559 URIBL_BLACK
#4 134801 URIBL_JP_SURBL
#5 119963 URIBL_SBL
#6 114410 HTML_MESSAGE
#7 111995 URIBL_WS_SURBL
#8 99093 URIBL_OB_SURBL
#9 96098 URIBL_SC_SURBL
#10 92592 MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER
#11 91374 MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID
#12 69953 MIME_HTML_ONLY
#13 68626 INFO_TLD
#14 64968 URIBL_AB_SURBL
#15 63657 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
#16 60161 FORGED_RCVD_HELO
#17 50662 MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY
#18 49725 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG
#19 49346 FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2
#20 33737 HTML_30_40
The first regular list is spamcop, the rest i dont even see inside the top
20.
Bye,
Raymond.
