On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:12:27 +0000 Steve Freegard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Loren Wilton wrote: > > X-SpamFilter-By: BOX Solutions SpamTrap 1.1 with qID > > lBDNlb6m031347, This message is to be blocked by code: bkndr63272 > > Subject: [Spam-Mail] We invite you to join us as a Silver > > PowerSeller! (This message should be blocked: bkndr63272) > > > > Shame they didn't just block it so I woudln't have to! > > > > Hehe - I've seen this happen before - e.g. messages from AOL and > others with 'X-Spam-Flag: YES' in the headers, but not in this > particular format. I now block these at SMTP time: > > 214-2.0.0 age=54139 (00 15:02:19) > 214-2.0.0 004 CLIENTS=341510 (100.00%) > 214-2.0.0 110 spamd-sender-marked-spam=16 (0.04%) > > So it doesn't happen that often. I did try writing an SA header rule > for these first, but it appears that SA strips out 'X-Spam-Flag' > headers out before the rules are run. I believe SA strips all headers that start with 'X-Spam-'. ------ _|_ (_| |
