hi Dirk, the plugin is really useful...the LOGINHASH-DNS-zone's gives even "better" results than the iXHASH...
These are our stats of the last four days: Email: 6765 Autolearn: 1400 AvgScore: 13.48 AvgScanTime: 2.32 sec Spam: 3225 Autolearn: 979 AvgScore: 28.11 AvgScanTime: 2.49 sec Ham: 3540 Autolearn: 421 AvgScore: 0.16 AvgScanTime: 2.16 sec Time Spent Running SA: 4.36 hours Time Spent Processing Spam: 2.23 hours Time Spent Processing Ham: 2.13 hours TOP SPAM RULES FIRED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCC_CHECK 2329 36.39 72.22 3.76 . . . 9 LOGINHASH 1515 22.42 46.98 0.06 . . . 14 LOGINHASH2 944 13.95 29.27 0.00 . . . 22 IXHASH 644 9.53 19.97 0.03 . . . Email: 4891 Autolearn: 883 AvgScore: 16.00 AvgScanTime: 2.03 sec Spam: 2670 Autolearn: 785 AvgScore: 28.64 AvgScanTime: 2.24 sec Ham: 2221 Autolearn: 98 AvgScore: 0.81 AvgScanTime: 1.78 sec Time Spent Running SA: 2.76 hours Time Spent Processing Spam: 1.66 hours Time Spent Processing Ham: 1.10 hours TOP SPAM RULES FIRED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCC_CHECK 2077 43.20 77.79 1.62 . . . 7 LOGINHASH 1377 28.22 51.57 0.14 . . . 12 LOGINHASH2 790 16.15 29.59 0.00 . . . 30 IXHASH 461 9.43 17.27 0.00 . . . Email: 5477 Autolearn: 1306 AvgScore: 20.18 AvgScanTime: 2.09 sec Spam: 3228 Autolearn: 1221 AvgScore: 33.73 AvgScanTime: 2.37 sec Ham: 2249 Autolearn: 85 AvgScore: 0.73 AvgScanTime: 1.67 sec Time Spent Running SA: 3.17 hours Time Spent Processing Spam: 2.13 hours Time Spent Processing Ham: 1.04 hours TOP SPAM RULES FIRED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCC_CHECK 2516 46.80 77.94 2.09 . . . 8 LOGINHASH 1399 25.63 43.34 0.22 . . . 24 LOGINHASH2 736 13.44 22.80 0.00 . . . 36 IXHASH 416 7.60 12.89 0.00 . . . Email: 6114 Autolearn: 1694 AvgScore: 21.93 AvgScanTime: 2.41 sec Spam: 3670 Autolearn: 1368 AvgScore: 36.66 AvgScanTime: 2.79 sec Ham: 2444 Autolearn: 326 AvgScore: -0.18 AvgScanTime: 1.84 sec Time Spent Running SA: 4.09 hours Time Spent Processing Spam: 2.84 hours Time Spent Processing Ham: 1.25 hours TOP SPAM RULES FIRED ---------------------------------------------------------------------- RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DCC_CHECK 3018 50.28 82.23 2.29 . . . 10 LOGINHASH 1452 23.77 39.56 0.04 . . . 24 LOGINHASH2 792 12.95 21.58 0.00 . . . 38 IXHASH 440 7.21 11.99 0.04 So i do think it's USEFUL :-) Pls - if possible - go on with the project :-) Ove Starckjohann > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Dirk Bonengel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Montag, 4. August 2008 23:13 > An: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Betreff: iXhash plugin and lists - feedback wanted > > > Hi all, > > I'm the author of the iXhash plugin, a piece of code that computes a > variety of 'fuzzy checksums' along the lines of the NiXSpam > project (run > by the German IT magazine iX). > I also run two DNS zones > (nospam.login-solutions.de,nospam.login-solutions.ag), > containing fuzzy > checksum data from various spam traps. > > Now, I'll leave my current job where I had the opportunity to run a > dedicated server to maintain the lists. > I wonder if it it is worth my while to actually migrate to > whole stuff > (and expand it to contain data from other sources) or to just > release a > final version of the plugin and call it quits. > > I guess this list is the best place to ask those of you who use the > plugin for feedback. I'd appreciate any comments and > information an hit > rates, FPs and such > > Thanks in advance > > Dirk > >