Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
> On 21.02.09 12:18, mouss wrote:
>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
>>> On 20.02.09 19:26, Matt Kettler wrote:
>>>> Since you're bouncing any off-list emails because you reject my entire
>>>> ISP, I'm going to drop out of aiding on this matter.
>>> I'm not rejecting "your ISP". I'm rejecting mail from addresses I could not
>>> complain back to.
>>>
>>>> Fix your own domain's over-zealous behaviors first.
>>> Fix your domain's RFC conformity first
>> so you're complaining about a high score for an invalid helo coupled
>> with extremely weired 3-domains in a hop mail and at the same time
>> rejecting mail from a large ISP because of rfci listing?
>>
>> if you're fighting for rfc compliance, reject both, and the issue is
>> closed ;-p
> 
> rejecting because HELO does not match violates RFC. case open.

I said "invalid". a "bare" IP is invalid in helo, and has been since 822.

Reply via email to