Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit : >>> On 21.02.09 12:18, mouss wrote: >>>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit : >>>>> On 20.02.09 19:26, Matt Kettler wrote: >>>>>> Since you're bouncing any off-list emails because you reject my entire >>>>>> ISP, I'm going to drop out of aiding on this matter. >>>>> I'm not rejecting "your ISP". I'm rejecting mail from addresses I could >>>>> not >>>>> complain back to. >>>>> >>>>>> Fix your own domain's over-zealous behaviors first. >>>>> Fix your domain's RFC conformity first >>>> so you're complaining about a high score for an invalid helo coupled >>>> with extremely weired 3-domains in a hop mail and at the same time >>>> rejecting mail from a large ISP because of rfci listing? >>>> >>>> if you're fighting for rfc compliance, reject both, and the issue is >>>> closed ;-p > >> Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit : >>> rejecting because HELO does not match violates RFC. case open. > > On 21.02.09 12:32, mouss wrote: >> I said "invalid". a "bare" IP is invalid in helo, and has been since 822.
correction: "since RFC 821", and not (year ;-) 822 ;-p > > good point, another thing to check for.
