Benny Pedersen a écrit : > On Sat, February 21, 2009 12:32, mouss wrote: >>> rejecting because HELO does not match violates RFC. case open. >> I said "invalid". a "bare" IP is invalid in helo, and has been since >> 822. > > just use all helo rules that postfix can do pr default is better > gives the answer on this one >
I do reject these in postfix, but I don't reject them if they are in Received headers. rejecting based on headers should be avoided. > if i remember postfix right: > > helo 127.0.0.1 is invalid > helo [127.0.0.1] is valid > it's not postfix, it's SMTP. the thing is that a lot of people read "literal IP" without checking the syntax definition. The RFC authors were too optimistic! > maybe i am wroung again :))) >
