Linda Walsh <sa-u...@tlinx.org> wrote: > We go > around redefining words to suit reality and catch the heat when the > rest of the world doesn't understand our meaning:
Please repeat after me: AWL is not an auto whitelist AWL is not an auto whitelist AWL is not an auto whitelist It's one of those funny jokes, like GNU. Feel free to click your heels together while repeating this affirmation, just whatever you do, DON'T say it in front of a mirror. Seriously, there's a crater somewhere in Mexico where a data warehouse used to sit the last time someone tried that. > An average? So it keeps the scores of all the past emails of > every email we ever got sent? Must just store a weighted average -- > otherwise the space (hmm...someone said something about 80MB+ > auto-whitelist DB files?).... Time to upgrade those 80MB drives, huh? > How difficult would it be to have the name of the module > reflect what it's actually doing? maybe roll out a name change with > the next ".dot" release of SA? (3.3? 3.4?) Might alleviate some > amount of confusion(?)... Why? It's not broken. Just pretend it stands for Averaged Weight List, and then you'll be able to sleep at night. Oh, and there's no need to reply to all. You're on a mailing list, so anybody who sent you a message from it is already on the list, and will get your replies. -- Top-posting is the computer equivalent of mailing a letter glued to the *outside* of an envelope, with a stamp attached via paper clip. -- Xcott Craver
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
