> On Mittwoch 27 Mai 2009 LuKreme wrote: > > No, you are confused. This is common, lots of people are confused > > about this. This is why many people think the name needs to be > > changed to "Averaged Weight List" or something similar.
On 28.05.09 12:06, Michael Monnerie wrote: > The name is really a mess. Even if you'd call it "Averaged Weight List", > when you read AWL then AutoWhiteList comes to your mind, right? no. It comes to your mind only because it was (and yet is) named that way. If there would be no "auto white list", we just would not know what AWL means. > It needs another TLA (three letter acronym), or maybe more, whatever. Even > AHBSASWAWB, as written my Matt Kettler, would be better than AWL. > > I don't really mind, just change it. Someone. But also the AWL shortcut. That would break any existing configuration. There's bugreport opened for this (i commented today) and admins just SHOULD read the docs. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. He who laughs last thinks slowest.
