Henrik K wrote: > > Yeah, given that my 4x3Ghz box masscheck peaks at 22 msgs/sec, without > Net/AWL/Bayes. But that's the 3.3 SVN ruleset.. wonder what version was > used > and any nondefault rules/settings? Certainly sounds strange that 1 core > could top out the same. Anyone else have figures? Maybe I've borked > something myself.. > The problem is not with 22 being a low number, but when we have other free cores to run different SA parallely why doesnt the throughput scale linearly .. I expect for 8 cores with 8 SA running simultaneously the number to be 150+ msgs/sec but it is 1/3rd at 50 msgs/sec -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Parallelizing-Spam-Assassin-tp24751958p24760294.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assass... John Rudd
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assass... jdow
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin LuKreme
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin Glenn Sieb
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin Linda Walsh
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin Patrick Ben Koetter
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin Henrik K
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin poifgh
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin poifgh
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin Nigel Frankcom
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin poifgh
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin Nigel Frankcom
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin Paweł Sasin
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin Henrik K
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin Linda Walsh
- Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin Henrik K