On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:46:42 +0100 "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" <rich...@buzzhost.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 23:36 +0100, RW wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:40:11 -0700 (PDT) > > linuxmagic <sa...@linuxmagic.com> wrote: > > > > > Incidently the point about backscatter is wrong. The traditional > > approach of classifying, and then discarding or filing to a spam > > folder, produces zero backscatter from spam. Backscatter is > > actually caused by rejecting at the SMTP level - when it's done on > > the wrong SMTP transaction. > > That is *not* correct. I clarified what I meant by that well before you posted.
