> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>>> 3) Evaluating whether an email is spam or not. Does the bayes
>>> classifier analyze headers if I have, for example, the following
>>> rule: "body BAYES_05 eval:check_bayes('0.00', '0.05')". According to
>>> the http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WritingRules : "Body rules
>>> also include the Subject as the first line of the body content". So,
>>> any headers that precede subject header are not considered by the
>>> bayes classifier?
>>
>> I don't have an answer for you here, but just another question. Why do
>> you want to mess with the bayes rules? They work very well as-is as
>> long as you make sure the database is being fed properly (learning spam
>> as spam and ham as ham with a decent mix of both being learned on a
>> regular basis).
On 26.07.10 08:13, John Hardin wrote:
> A better answer here would be "the order of the headers doesn't matter."
at least until we won't have a rule that will score by header order :)
(a bayes score probably)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Microsoft dick is soft to do no harm
