Hello Matus UHLAR - fantomas, Am 2011-05-12 09:06:10, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > On 11.05.11 19:30, Joe Sniderman wrote: > > We do something similar, except that the maximum number of recipients > > per envelope we set at 1. The second and all subsequent get a 4yz error > > during RCPT. We perform this after greylisting, ie: > > Are you aware that this violates RFC standard?
Which RFC? Limiting the "recipients per envelope" is legitim.
> You can not expect that when you violate it, others will behave at your
> needs. For example, I would imediately try other MX server when sending
> mail and not continue with DATA.
I get per day arround 26.000.000 spams on my courier-proxys and if I do
not limit the number "recipients per envelope" I would receive per
second 300 spams.
Note: 80% of the spams are rejected on SMTP Level without invoking SA.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ######################
Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux
itsystems@tdnet France EURL itsystems@tdnet UG (limited liability)
Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack
Apt. 917 (homeoffice)
50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstraße 17
67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany
Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil
Tel: +49-176-86004575 office
<http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.flexray4linux.org/>
<http://www.debian.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.can4linux.org/>
Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de
ICQ #328449886
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
